ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Topic-Aware Summarization of Lived Health Care Experiences: Large Language Model Evaluation Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Patients' Voice inmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Existing work to understand adults' health care experiences has focused on the analysis of patient feedback provided as written responses to after-visit surveys or social media discourse. Often, such written feedback has been studied using natural language processing techniques, such as topic detection and sentiment analysis, to provide coarse-grained insights. Storytelling is a powerful form of communication and may provide insights into factors contributing to gaps in health care outcomes and avenues for improvement. In addition, studying health care experiences using natural language processing techniques has been limited to patients. The experiences of stakeholders, such as caregivers and health care providers, remain underexplored. Objective: We extract fine-grained insights from health care experiences through narratives collected from patients, caregivers, and health care providers using large language models (LLMs). Topic detection, together with hierarchical summarization of long-form stories from individuals, offers fine-grained insights. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that generated summaries can be evaluated using the LLM-as-a-judge framework and validates the outcomes through comparisons with 2 domain experts. Methods: Fifty automatically transcribed stories of African American experiences were used to identify topics in their experiences using the latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) technique. Stories about a given topic were summarized using an open-source LLM-based hierarchical summarization approach. Topic summaries were generated by summarizing across story summaries for each story that addressed a given topic. The generated topic summaries were rated for fabrication, accuracy, comprehensiveness, and usefulness by the GPT-4 model; its reliability was validated against the original story summaries by 2 domain experts. Results: Whisper-based automatic transcription of audio narrations achieved a Levenshtein score of 6%. Twenty-six topics were identified using LDA and labeled using the LLM in the 50 African American stories. The GPT-4 ratings suggest that topic summaries were free from fabrication, highly accurate, comprehensive, and useful. The reliability of GPT ratings compared to expert assessments showed moderate-to-high agreement (Bennett S-score of 0.65 or higher). Our approach identified African American experience-relevant topics, such as health behaviors, interactions with medical team members, caregiving, and symptom management, among others. Such insights could help researchers learn from unstructured datasets in an efficient manner-leveraging the communicative power of storytelling. Conclusions: The use of LDA and LLMs to identify and summarize the experiences of African American individuals suggests a variety of possible avenues for health research and possible clinical improvements to support patients and caregivers, thereby improving health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.