Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42275572›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Practice Areas, Skills, and Core Competencies of Advanced Practice Physiotherapists Working in Tertiary Care in Germany: Protocol for a 3-Round Delphi Study to Establish Expert Consensus.

Lukas Kühn, Leonie Heimken, Lena Frenz, Annalena Paus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lukas KühnDepartment of Therapeutic Health Professions, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149, Germany, 49 2518348160.ORCID 0000-0002-5988-1194
Leonie HeimkenDepartment of Therapeutic Health Professions, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149, Germany, 49 2518348160.ORCID 0009-0008-9110-3000
Lena FrenzDepartment of Therapeutic Health Professions, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149, Germany, 49 2518348160.ORCID 0009-0003-3196-7716
Annalena PausDepartment of Therapeutic Health Professions, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149, Germany, 49 2518348160.ORCID 0009-0006-0867-8002

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Specifically in primary musculoskeletal care settings, the employment of advanced physiotherapy practice (APP) roles seems to be safe, as well as clinically and financially effective. In tertiary care settings, the implementation of APP roles is still in its infancy. A structured identification of relevant APP roles and a definition of practice areas, needed skills, and core competencies is widely pending. Objective: This study aims to identify and prioritize the most relevant areas of tertiary care for the implementation of APP roles within the German health care system. Additionally, it is aimed to achieve expert consensus on practice areas, needed skills, and core competencies relevant to execute identified roles. Methods: A total of 100 national experts will be invited to participate in a 3-round Delphi survey. Participants will purposively be sampled among physiotherapists with extensive clinical and/or academic experiences in German tertiary care. Data will be pseudonymized and collected via online questionnaires. In Delphi round 1, close-ended questions on relevant APP roles and open-ended input on practice areas, skills, and core competencies will be queried. Open-ended questions will be structured according to key domains of the National Health Service multiprofessional framework for advanced clinical practice. In round 2, participants will rate close-ended items on practice areas, skills, and core competencies that emerged from open-ended questions of round 1. Each item will be rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from "not relevant at all" to "extremely relevant." Consensus will be set on ≥70% agreement per item (including "5=fairly relevant," "6=very relevant," and "7=extremely relevant"). Items with agreements of ≤30% will be excluded. Items of 31% to 69% agreement will be reevaluated in round 3. Descriptive statistics (median, IQR, and absolute and relative frequencies) will be used to visualize response patterns, and McNemar and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests will be applied to explore changes between rounds. Results: Data collection took place between January and May 2026. For the first Delphi round, 98 experts were invited, of which 37 fully completed round 1. In round 2, these 37 experts were invited, of which 34 fully completed Delphi round 2. Following these response rates, we were confident to receive the targeted study sample of 20 experts after data collection of Delphi round 3 was completed. Data collection for the third and final round was completed in May 2026 and included 32 final respondents. Conclusions: Findings will support evidence-based APP role development and contribute to optimizing tertiary care areas relevant to physiotherapy care in Germany.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetencePhysical TherapistsTertiary Health CareConsensusDelphi TechniqueGermanyHumansSurveys and Questionnairesacute careadvanced clinical practiceDelphi techniqueinpatient carephysical therapy

Identifiers

PMID42275572
PMCPMC13257777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.