Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42275454›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

Augmenting large language models with clinical knowledge graph for personalized perioperative fluid therapy question answering.

Jie Song, Jinhua Feng, Yuxin Zhang, Cheng Bi, Xin Zheng, Zhichuan Xu, Jiale Du, Mengqiao He, Meng Xiao, Xiaoran Li and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jie SongJoint Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence for Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine and Institutes for Systems Genetics, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1606-0605
Jinhua FengJoint Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence for Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine and Institutes for Systems Genetics, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yuxin ZhangJoint Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence for Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine and Institutes for Systems Genetics, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Cheng BiJoint Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence for Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine and Institutes for Systems Genetics, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xin ZhengJoint Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence for Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine and Institutes for Systems Genetics, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhichuan XuJoint Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence for Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine and Institutes for Systems Genetics, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jiale DuJoint Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence for Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine and Institutes for Systems Genetics, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Mengqiao HeDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Meng XiaoJoint Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence for Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine and Institutes for Systems Genetics, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoran LiJoint Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence for Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine and Institutes for Systems Genetics, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qiongfang CaoJoint Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence for Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine and Institutes for Systems Genetics, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Chi ZhangJoint Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence for Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine and Institutes for Systems Genetics, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hao YangJoint Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence for Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine and Institutes for Systems Genetics, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Rongrong WuOperation Management Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Bairong ShenJoint Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence for Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine and Institutes for Systems Genetics, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2899-1531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personalized perioperative fluid therapy is important for reducing postoperative complications and adverse outcomes. Although large language models (LLMs) show promise in healthcare, their application in fluid therapy remains challenged by hallucinations, limited domain-specific knowledge, and insufficient personalization. To address these limitations, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is an effective method, while Knowledge Graphs (KGs) provide more accurate and reliable information. In this paper, we constructed a Personalized Fluid Therapy Knowledge Graph (PFTKG) comprising 6,490 entities and 15,687 relationships, and adapted GraphRAG, a graph-based RAG strategy that employs community detection and recursive summarization to support finding-level retrieval of clinically relevant information. We compared GraphRAG with document-based retrieval-augmented generation (DocRAG) and mainstream prompting strategies, including Vanilla, Chain-of-Thought (CoT), and Reflection-of-Thoughts (RoT), across three LLMs: GPT-4o, Claude Opus 4, and Gemini 2.5 Pro. Performance was evaluated using a 300-question knowledge-based question set and a 262-question retrospective case-based question set derived from 206 abdominal surgery patients. Evaluation included accuracy, honesty, error composition, response length, and response time. On the knowledge-based question set, GraphRAG achieved the highest average accuracy: 96.89% for multiple-choice questions and 66.44% for open-ended questions. On the retrospective case-based question set, GraphRAG also showed the strongest overall performance, with an average accuracy of 71.12%, compared with 62.47% for DocRAG, 54.20% for CoT, 52.67% for Vanilla, and 52.54% for RoT. Adding a "Don't know" option increased explicit acknowledgment of uncertainty, and GraphRAG reduced context-irrelevant errors compared with DocRAG. These results support GraphRAG as a domain-adapted retrieval strategy for personalized perioperative fluid therapy question answering. By integrating a clinical knowledge graph with hierarchical summarization and finding-level retrieval, it improved answer accuracy and promoted more conservative responses under uncertainty in both knowledge-based and retrospective case-based evaluations, supporting its use in future clinically integrated studies.

Identifiers

PMID42275454
PMCPMC13257993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.