ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Augmenting large language models with clinical knowledge graph for personalized perioperative fluid therapy question answering.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Initial-Visit Specialty Triage in Rare Diseases Using Large Language Models: Retrospective Benchmarking Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Personalized perioperative fluid therapy is important for reducing postoperative complications and adverse outcomes. Although large language models (LLMs) show promise in healthcare, their application in fluid therapy remains challenged by hallucinations, limited domain-specific knowledge, and insufficient personalization. To address these limitations, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is an effective method, while Knowledge Graphs (KGs) provide more accurate and reliable information. In this paper, we constructed a Personalized Fluid Therapy Knowledge Graph (PFTKG) comprising 6,490 entities and 15,687 relationships, and adapted GraphRAG, a graph-based RAG strategy that employs community detection and recursive summarization to support finding-level retrieval of clinically relevant information. We compared GraphRAG with document-based retrieval-augmented generation (DocRAG) and mainstream prompting strategies, including Vanilla, Chain-of-Thought (CoT), and Reflection-of-Thoughts (RoT), across three LLMs: GPT-4o, Claude Opus 4, and Gemini 2.5 Pro. Performance was evaluated using a 300-question knowledge-based question set and a 262-question retrospective case-based question set derived from 206 abdominal surgery patients. Evaluation included accuracy, honesty, error composition, response length, and response time. On the knowledge-based question set, GraphRAG achieved the highest average accuracy: 96.89% for multiple-choice questions and 66.44% for open-ended questions. On the retrospective case-based question set, GraphRAG also showed the strongest overall performance, with an average accuracy of 71.12%, compared with 62.47% for DocRAG, 54.20% for CoT, 52.67% for Vanilla, and 52.54% for RoT. Adding a "Don't know" option increased explicit acknowledgment of uncertainty, and GraphRAG reduced context-irrelevant errors compared with DocRAG. These results support GraphRAG as a domain-adapted retrieval strategy for personalized perioperative fluid therapy question answering. By integrating a clinical knowledge graph with hierarchical summarization and finding-level retrieval, it improved answer accuracy and promoted more conservative responses under uncertainty in both knowledge-based and retrospective case-based evaluations, supporting its use in future clinically integrated studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.