ArticlePloS one2026
A simulation-based hybrid causal predictive framework for stockout risk analysis in supply chain.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stockout risk is a persistent challenge in supply chain management, undermining both operational efficiency and customer satisfaction. This study adopts a multi-method approach to investigate the causal effect of lead time on stockout risk by integrating causal inference techniques with predictive analytics. The proposed framework combines Propensity Score Matching (PSM), Instrumental Variables (IV-2SLS), Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW), and Doubly Robust Estimation (DRE) alongside machine learning (ML) algorithms and time series forecasting. Using a dataset of 20,000 supply chain incidents, the study estimates the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) and evaluates predictive model performance. PSM generated the most credible ATE (0.882), confirming a strong causal link between lead time and stockout risk. IV analysis using supplier distance as an instrument yielded a reduced and statistically insignificant ATE (0.5535, p = 0.3148), suggesting instrument weakness. Among ML models, Random Forest and LightGBM achieved superior predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.25; MSE = 0.736), while Moving Average forecasting effectively captured stockout patterns over time (R2 = 0.883). The findings identify PSM as the most robust technique for causal inference. This study advances the literature by integrating causal inference, ML, and time series methods, offering practical, data-driven insights to strengthen operational resilience and guide proactive inventory management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.