Observational studyPloS one2026
Benchmarking newborn care quality in Ghana: Evidence from structured observations of clinical practice against WHO quality standards.
Observational study in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe neonatal mortality rate in Ghana remains above the global average, which is far from meeting SDG 3.2. Notably, institutional neonatal deaths are on the increase, potentially due to healthcare professionals' poor adherence to quality newborn care guidelines. This study assessed the adherence of clinical healthcare professionals to guidelines on quality newborn care in Ghana.
methodsThis observational study collected data from 158 healthcare professionals across six health facilities in Ghana. A data collection tool was developed based on the WHO standard for improving quality of care for small and sick newborns and the Ghana Health Services Standards for Newborn Health Services. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to measure differences in categorical data, while logistic regression models were employed to analyse the association between dependent and independent variables at a 95% confidence level. Six facility-level discussions with the observed healthcare professionals were held to validate and interpret the quantitative findings.
resultsOverall, only 31 (20%) of healthcare professionals demonstrated good adherence to infection prevention and control (IPC), while 73 (46%) adhered poorly. Moderate adherence levels were seen in essential care for every newborn (ECEN) at 53% and respectful maternal and newborn care at 51%. During validation discussions, healthcare professionals mentioned poorly located handwashing materials, parental preference for methylated spirit over chlorhexidine for umbilical cord care, and lack of protocols for pain assessment as key barriers to adherence.
conclusionThe study findings revealed low adherence levels to quality newborn care practices, especially in IPC practices. Moderate adherence levels were found in ECEN and respectful maternal and newborn care. These findings highlight the need to improve adherence with quality newborn care standards in Ghana. The Institutional Care and Family Health Divisions of the Ghana Health Service should integrate these findings into ongoing quality improvement efforts to achieve better neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.