Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42275397›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Facilitating early diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension with dynamic chest radiography: Protocol for a multicenter, assessor-blinded, case-wise randomized superiority reader study (FIND-DCR).

Kazuya Hosokawa, Yuzo Yamasaki, Junji Kishimoto, Tomomi Nagayama, Shiro Adachi, Shinji Naganawa, Takumi Inami, Kenichi Yokoyama, Satoshi Yasuda, Kei Takase and 14 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Kazuya HosokawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1517-3660
Yuzo YamasakiDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Junji KishimotoCenter for Clinical and Translational Research, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tomomi NagayamaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shiro AdachiDepartment of Cardiology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Shinji NaganawaDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0214-613X
Takumi InamiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenichi YokoyamaDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Kyorin University, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi YasudaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kei TakaseDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kayoko KubotaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Takashi YoshiuraDepartment of Radiology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2918-4336
Toshihiko SugiuraDepartment of Respirology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Takashi UnoDiagnostic Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Masaharu KataokaThe Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Takatoshi AokiDepartment of Radiology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Soichiro UsuiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1752-8082
Satoshi KobayashiDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7759-399X
Yu TaniguchiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Takamichi MurakamiDepartment of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Yuichi TamuraPulmonary Hypertension Center, International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiro FukumotoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8947-109X
Kousei IshigamiDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kohtaro AbeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a treatable cause of pulmonary hypertension but remains under-recognized and is often diagnosed with delay. Limited access to lung ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy, especially outside tertiary centers, is one contributor. Dynamic chest radiography (DCR), with a pulmonary circulation analysis program, can provide a rapid, non-invasive, and widely deployable assessment of pulmonary perfusion. We describe the protocol of a multicenter reader study testing whether adding DCR-based analysis to standard initial work-up improves diagnostic accuracy for CTEPH among patients with echocardiographically suspected pulmonary hypertension. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This investigator-initiated, multicenter, assessor-blinded, case-wise randomized superiority reader study compares standard initial work-up (blood tests, chest X-ray, ECG, pulmonary function tests, and transthoracic echocardiography per guidelines) with standard work-up plus DCR-based pulmonary circulation analysis. The primary endpoint is diagnostic accuracy for discrimination between CTEPH and non-CTEPH in the intention-to-treat set. The final diagnosis of CTEPH versus non-CTEPH will be defined as the reference standard according to the Japanese and European guidelines for pulmonary hypertension. Secondary endpoints include sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values; agreement with V/Q scintigraphy regarding regional perfusion defects using κ statistics; and STARD-conformant academic performance evaluation of DCR-based pulmonary circulation analysis and lung perfusion scintigraphy in relation to the site-level final diagnosis of CTEPH versus non-CTEPH in a full analysis set. Safety endpoints include adverse events during DCR acquisition and device malfunctions. The target sample size is 108 cases with 1:1 allocation. Recruitment started on 30/07/2025 and is expected to continue until 28/02/2027, with overall study completion planned for 31/05/2027. DISCUSSION: This multicenter reader study addresses a key limitation of current CTEPH diagnostic pathways-reliance on V/Q scintigraphy, which may be delayed or unavailable outside tertiary centers-by evaluating whether DCR-based pulmonary circulation analysis can improve early discrimination of CTEPH and support timely referral. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT), jRCT2072250027.

Indexed as

Hypertension, PulmonaryPulmonary EmbolismRadiography, ThoracicChronic DiseaseEarly DiagnosisEchocardiographyEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID42275397
PMCPMC13258118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.