Trial reportPloS one2026
Cluster-randomized trial of Homework, Organization, and Planning Skills program compared to treatment as usual/waitlist for youth ages 11-14: Study protocol for conceptual replication.
Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04465708 (Evaluation of Homework, Organization, and Planning Skills), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Homework, Organization, and Planning Skills (HOPS) Program: A Conceptual Replication
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrganization, time management, and planning (OTMP) difficulties are associated with academic underachievement. OTMP skills training programs are effective in reducing OTMP deficits and improving academic performance. A randomized controlled trial of Homework, Organization, and Planning Skills (HOPS) for students ages 11-14 found it to be effective with medium to large effects. In that study, HOPS was provided by counselors employed by the research team. This study is a replication examining HOPS under more authentic conditions when providers are employed by schools serving enrolled students. The primary aim is to evaluate HOPS offered by school providers in relation to treatment-as-usual/waitlist (TAU/WL). To respond to limited school resources post-COVID-19, HOPS is also provided by research team members, creating the opportunity to replicate the findings from the prior trial and explore differential effectiveness when HOPS is implemented by school vs. research providers.
methodsStudents in about 30 schools serving students ages 11-14 will be enrolled. Schools are randomly assigned to HOPS vs. TAU/WL on a 2:1 ratio. Students assigned to HOPS schools are randomly assigned to a school vs. research provider on a 1:1 basis. Providers receive two hours of training and additional assistance on request. Child outcomes related to OTMP skills, homework, and academic performance are assessed at post-treatment, 6-month (from baseline) follow-up, and 12-month follow-up. HOPS sessions are video recorded for fidelity coding. Potential effect modifiers include student ADHD, oppositional defiant, and internalizing symptoms, and family socioeconomic level. Analyses will use mixed effects modeling. The goal of the study is to enroll 135 participants, yielding a minimal detectable effect size of 0.50, within the expected range based on prior research. DISCUSSION: The study is unique in examining intervention implementation and effectiveness when intervention is provided under authentic practice conditions.
trial registrationThis study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04465708).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.