Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42275392›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The Protocol for: Do peers enhance behavior change in group motivational interviewing? A translational clinical trial investigating brain synchrony in underage emerging adults during an fMRI hyperscanning task and association with alcohol use reductions.

Sarah W Feldstein Ewing, Genevieve F Dash, Karen A Hudson, Benedict Hyun, Manshu Yang, Linnea Stahl, Kristine Rømer Thomsen, Francesca M Filbey

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06115252 (Partnering to Enhance Emerging Adults' Response to Programs), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06115252 narecruitingnot on this map

Partnering to Enhance Emerging Adults' Response to Programs (PEER)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUConn HealthRan2025 to 2028Enrolled248ConditionsAlcohol Use, UnspecifiedArmsMotivational Interviewing (MI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah W Feldstein EwingCentre for Alcohol and Drug Research, Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9120-9306
Genevieve F DashCentre for Alcohol and Drug Research, Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Karen A HudsonDepartment of Psychiatry, UConn School of Medicine (UConn Health), Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America.
Benedict HyunDepartment of Psychiatry, UConn School of Medicine (UConn Health), Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America.
Manshu YangDepartment of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9687-2302
Linnea StahlSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6943-8890
Kristine Rømer ThomsenCentre for Alcohol and Drug Research, Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Francesca M FilbeySchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

Do peers enhance or detract progress in group motivational interviewing? A look into emerging adult brain and behaviorR01AA030678 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND · PI Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing, Francesca Filbey · 2023 to 2026
$1.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA030678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

US emerging adults under legal drinking age (underage emerging adults; U-EA; ages 18-19) are unlikely to seek or receive indicated health risk behavior interventions, thus it is imperative to find brief, effective interventions to reduce U-EA health risk behaviors, such as drinking. Developmental neuroscience reflects that peers hold higher neural salience during adolescence, as evidenced by differential neural response with real and/or simulated peers, even when those peers are not friends, and particularly in the context of alcohol. Peers also activate positive (prosocial) neural and health behavior responses among adolescents. The role of positive, prosocial peer feedback is consequential given that the most widely-used platforms for U-EA behavioral interventions are group-based platforms. We propose functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) hyperscanning (tandem dyadic scanning) to evaluate U-EA brain response during group motivational interviewing (GMI) for health behavior change. This study will enroll n = 248 U-EA (ages 18-19) with ≥1 past month binge drinking event (4/3 standard drinks per occasion for males/females) via community and university campus recruitment and deliver group MI to peer dyads (no comparator; within-subjects design; ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06115252). Synchronized fMRI (hyperscanning) will be used to examine brain response to positive, prosocial peer-directed health promotive language (peer-directed change talk) generated during and extracted from the GMI session. Primary outcomes include fMRI-based hyperscanning metrics (BOLD synchrony in social cognition network) and their association with behavioral measures (past-month alcohol use days measured via Timeline Followback) at 12-months (primary outcome) and 3- and 6-months (secondary outcomes) post-GMI. We hypothesize that greater neural alignment in the social cognition network during positive, prosocial peer interactions (peer-directed change talk) will be associated with greater post-intervention behavior change (lower number of past month drinking days) at each follow-up point. This translational study is crucial for making meaningful gains in improving interventions for youth health behavior.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06115252.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingBinge DrinkingBrainMotivational InterviewingPeer GroupUnderage DrinkingAdolescentClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleSocial GroupTranslational Research, BiomedicalYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42275392
PMCPMC13257965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.