Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42275386›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Signal combination in flutter vibration perception.

Shasha Wei, Alex R Wade, Catherine E J Preston, Daniel H Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shasha WeiDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8975-4214
Alex R WadeDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Catherine E J PrestonDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Daniel H BakerDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0161-443X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the brain's integration of auditory and visual inputs has been extensively investigated, the mechanisms underlying somatosensory signal combination remain less explored. Here, we combine psychophysical thresholds with steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials (SSSEPs) to investigate how vibrotactile inputs are combined across fingers. We find that doubling the number of stimulated digits leads to a weak improvement in detection threshold, consistent with probability summation, whereas introducing a masking stimulus to interleaved digits induces inter-digit suppression. Correspondingly, EEG recordings reveal a ~ 1.4-fold increase in SSSEP amplitude when doubling the number of digits stimulated at the same frequency, reflecting a summation effect. In contrast, SSSEP amplitudes decrease when digits are vibrated at two different frequencies, further supporting the presence of suppression. These results are consistent with a model featuring inhibition between digits and reveal that the weight of suppression is intermediate between that observed in binocular vision and binaural hearing.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, SomatosensoryTouch PerceptionVibrationAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleFingersHumansMaleSensory ThresholdsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42275386
PMCPMC13258021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.