Observational studyPloS one2026
Dressing-induced hemodynamic instability in patients with heart failure: Implications for nursing care.
Observational study in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure (HF) restricts activities of daily living, impacting prognosis and quality of life. Dressing requires sustained upper-limb movements, postural transitions, and fine-motor tasks that may impose cardiovascular and autonomic demands, potentially informing on physiological tolerance during daily activities.
objectiveThis observational study compared hemodynamic, autonomic, subjective, and upper-limb sensor count (ULSC) responses during dressing across HF clinical courses to characterize recovery dynamics during daily activities and identify nursing support requirements.
methodsWe compared healthy controls (HCs; n = 15), de novo HF (NO-HF; n = 12), and recurrent HF (R-HF; n = 12) groups. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), peripheral oxygen saturation, HR variability, Borg scale score, ULSC, dressing duration, and HR recovery (HRR) were measured at rest, during dressing, and after 20 min of recovery. Linear mixed-effects models tested group, time, and interaction. Pairwise comparisons were performed via Bonferroni adjustment.
resultsHR increased during and immediately post-dressing across groups, with NO-HF exhibiting higher HR than R-HF. HRR varied among groups (HC vs. NO-HF: P = 0.108; HC vs. R-HF: P < 0.0001; NO-HF vs. R-HF: P = 0.026). SBP displayed a group effect (P = 0.034). Peak HR responses tended to occur immediately post-dressing in HC and NO-HF, whereas R-HF descriptively showed a delayed peak around 5 min. No significant group × time interaction was observed. ULSC showed no group differences after dressing time and body size adjustments. Patients with HF had higher Borg scores than did HCs (NO-HF, P < 0.001; R-HF, P = 0.028).
conclusionsDespite being low-intensity, dressing was associated with measurable physiological and subjective HF responses. R-HF trended toward slower HR recovery; NO-HF demonstrated consistently higher HR levels and perceived exertion. Monitoring recovery responses and supporting pacing and symptom self-monitoring during daily activities may be important in HF nursing care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.