Article in Bioconjugate chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Xuandi HouDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9718-6539
Sa CaiDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Han CuiDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6473-9232
Zhongyu LiuDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2777-8360
Su ZhaoDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Ling-Yi ZhangDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-4792-8379
Ani BaghdasaryanDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Victoria CrunkletonDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Mark L BrongersmaDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Guosong HongDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8858-4471
Funding
Rapid brain-wide optogenetic screening with a noninvasive, dynamically programmable in vivo light sourceRF1NS126076 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BUTTS-PAULY, KIM, CHEN, XIAOKE · 2022 to 2022
$1.8M
Brain Aging Studies with Single-Neuron Resolution Using Syringe-Injectable ElectronicsR00AG056636 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HONG, GUOSONG · 2018 to 2020
$745k
Mesh electronics for understanding space encoding in the amphibian brainR34NS127103 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GIOCOMO, LISA, HONG, GUOSONG · 2022 to 2022
Tissue-clearing techniques have transformed optical imaging of fixed specimens, yet their application to living systems remains limited by toxicity and removal of key tissue components. We recently demonstrated that absorbing molecules such as tartrazine can reversibly render live mouse skin transparent. Subsequently, it was reported that isotonic protein solutions can achieve
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Tartrazine Clears Live Cells while Preserving Viability at High Refractive Indices and Osmolality. · full record | OpenQuestion