Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42275282›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Barriers and facilitators to community-based, peer-led sexual and reproductive health intervention for adolescent girls and young women in northeastern Uganda: A qualitative study.

Alimah Komuhangi, Rogers Kajabwangu, Jonathan Izudi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alimah KomuhangiAfya na Haki Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Canaan Sites, Gayaza, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4871-8698
Rogers KajabwanguDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4101-011X
Jonathan IzudiDirectorate of Graduate Training, Research and Innovations, Muni University, Arua, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9065-0389

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peer-led interventions can effectively improve sexual and reproductive health (SRH) knowledge, promote safer sexual behaviors among adolescents and young people, especially where health system capacity is limited. To inform a planned pre-post study, we explored the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a community-based, peer-led SRH intervention for adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) aged 15-24 years in northeastern Uganda. We designed a qualitative case study and collected data through focus group discussions across AGYW in six categories: in-school, out-of-school, ever given birth, and never given birth, aged 15-17 years, and aged ≥18 years. We also conducted key informant interviews with SRH officials in the district and at two health facilities. Data collection was guided by the socioecological model. We performed thematic analysis and reported findings using themes along with the participants' quotes mapped onto the socioecological model. A total of 51 adolescent girls and young women, and five key informant interviews with the district and health facility level officials were conducted. Findings show that the anticipated barriers and facilitators to implementation occur across socioecological levels. At the individual level, stigma and fear of judgment hindered participation, whereas trust in peers supported engagement. Limited autonomy hindered access at the interpersonal level, but support from family and friends helped. Institutional barriers included judgmental provider attitudes and confidentiality concerns; existing youth-friendly services and school clubs were facilitators. At the community level, myths, misconceptions, and restrictive cultural norms posed challenges, while community dialogues and champions encouraged acceptance. No major policy barriers were noted; however, supportive SRH policies and existing partnerships were facilitators. The implementation of the intervention may be influenced by several factors across individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and policy levels. Future implementation should consider addressing the barriers while leveraging the facilitators to enhance implementation outcomes among AGYW.

Identifiers

PMID42275282
PMCPMC13257979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.