ReviewStereotactic and functional neurosurgery2026
State-of-the-Art Imaging and Localization Assessment in Post-Operative Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: A Review.
Review in Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD), dependent on precise electrode placement relative to intended anatomical and functional targets. Post-operative imaging, primarily magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), is essential for verifying lead position, assessing surgical accuracy, and guiding stimulation programming. SUMMARY: Most centers perform imaging within the first week after surgery, typically using CT or MRI-CT fusion to confirm electrode location and detect complications. CT offers submillimeter resolution (slice thickness 0.5-1.25 mm; voxel ∼0.5 mm) for clear electrode visualization, while MRI (particularly T1-MPRAGE, T2-FLAIR, and GRE sequences) provides superior anatomical contrast and artifact characterization. KEY MESSAGES: Registration between pre- and post-operative scans remains the predominant localization technique, though automated pipelines such as Lead-DBS, Brainlab Elements™, SureTune4™ now achieve consistent precision within ±0.5-1.5 mm across platforms. This review summarizes current post-operative imaging strategies and quantitative localization techniques in DBS for PD. It discusses the advantages and limitations of each modality and outlines future directions in automation, multimodal integration, and personalized imaging pipelines for improving the accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical utility of post-operative DBS assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.