ArticleThe ISME journal2026
Predicted shifts in bacterial and algal contributions to DMSP and DMS dynamics during a coastal spring-summer bloom.
Article in The ISME journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ubiquitous marine microalgae and bacteria produce the abundant organosulfur compound dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) and/or catabolize it to climate-active gases, such as dimethylsulfide (DMS), with major consequences for global biogeochemistry and climate. However, their relative and dynamic roles in DMSP synthesis and catabolism remain poorly resolved, particularly during natural bloom events. Here, we combined metagenomics and metatranscriptomics, with measurements of intracellular/particulate DMSP (DMSPp), DMS concentrations, and DMSPp production rates, as well as microscopy and flow cytometry, to predict the key microbes and enzymes driving DMSP/DMS dynamics during a spring-summer bloom in the Western English Channel. Microalgae and bacteria expressing the DMSP synthesis genes DSYB/DSYE and dsyB were likely major and significant DMSP producers, respectively, except during the largest observed DMSP spike. This spike coincided with elevated Synechococcus and autotrophic flagellate biomass but minimal DMSP synthesis gene expression. Axenic Synechococcus strains contained no detectable DMSP, implying that flagellates with novel DMSP synthesis genes were likely responsible. Microbial DMSP import potential far exceeded catabolism, suggesting strong selection for DMSP uptake. Bacteria were the major predicted DMSP degraders, with DMSP demethylation potential dwarfing cleavage. However, the highest DMS concentrations were linked to Haptophyta expressing the DMSP lyase gene Alma, implying the significance of algal DMSP cleavage. Methanethiol-dependent DMS production was also likely important, with bacterial mddH transcripts coinciding with another major DMS spike. Overall, these results imply dynamic and contrasting roles of microalgae and bacteria, and their pathways, in coastal DMSP/DMS and sulfur cycling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.