ArticleMemory & cognition2026
The role of encoding processes in the temporal compression of negative events in episodic memory.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Episodic memory allows individuals to mentally reconstruct past experiences in a temporally compressed form, such that remembering typically unfolds faster than the original event. This compression is not uniform: recent evidence indicates that negative events are remembered with less temporal compression than neutral ones, suggesting enhanced preservation of event unfolding. The present study investigated the role of encoding processes in this emotional memory advantage. In Experiment 1, we used a divided-attention manipulation to test whether the availability of attentional resources at encoding modulates the effect of emotion on temporal compression. Divided attention reduced overall memory quality - elevating compression rates and reducing detail and dynamism - but did not alter the emotional memory advantage. Experiment 2 examined whether negative emotion influences event segmentation. Results showed that emotion and event segmentation exerted independent effects on temporal compression. Experiment 3 collected online descriptions of unfolding events as a proxy for the amount and type of information attended to during encoding. Results showed that participants attended to comparable amounts of information during negative and neutral events. However, similarity analyses revealed that the correspondence between online descriptions and memory narratives from Experiment 1 decreased for neutral videos encoded under divided attention, whereas it remained stable for negative videos. Together, these findings indicate that negative events produce richer and less compressed memory representations through mechanisms that operate beyond attentional allocation and event segmentation, potentially involving rapid replay or early consolidation processes at event offset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42274994What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.