ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026
Improving Access and Reducing the Burden on Public Ophthalmology: Collaborative Telehealth Models Between Ophthalmology and Optometry in Australia.
Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCollaborative care between optometry and ophthalmology has demonstrated the potential to improve timely access to care. This study examines three settings where real-time optometry-facilitated telehealth was used to expedite specialist eye care in rural and remote Western Australia. Referrals to ophthalmology were triaged to telehealth or face-to-face services. For telehealth, optometrists performed a comprehensive in-person assessment, then facilitated video-consultation with an ophthalmologist during the same attendance for collaborative decision making.
methodsIn 2023, retrospective chart review was undertaken for ophthalmology services in towns more than 1500 km from the capital city. Optometrists performed comprehensive in-person assessments and facilitated telehealth in three settings: hospital, community clinic and visiting outreach. Attendance rates were compared between collaborative telehealth and face-to-face ophthalmology. Follow up outcomes and diagnoses for telehealth consultations were reported.
resultsA total of 1876 non-surgical ophthalmology episodes of care were delivered in the 12-month period, of which 1044 (55.7%) were delivered by optometry using telehealth. Of those managed by telehealth, only 83 episodes of care required a subsequent face-to-face ophthalmology consultation. The hospital setting provided the greatest proportion (76.4%) of telehealth. Adjusted logistic regression showed the odds of attendance were 3.6 (95% CI: 2.6-5.0) times higher for telehealth appointments than face-to-face (p < 0.001). Surgical rates of outreach ophthalmology were high (30.0 to 74.1% of activity). Common diagnoses in telehealth included cataract, pterygium for direct surgical booking and chronic conditions (glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy) for instituting appropriate management.
conclusionsCollaborative telehealth with optometry improves access to ophthalmology services in rural Australia and should be considered in metropolitan settings and other countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.