ReviewFamilial cancer2026
RPS20 as a colorectal cancer predisposition gene: an integrated review of the literature and evaluation in 9738 cases and 161,403 controls.
Review in Familial cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Germline variants in Ribosomal Protein S20 (RPS20) have been reported to predispose to colorectal cancer (CRC) based on occurrence in a total of 3455 CRC cases and co-segregation with disease in 3 families. RPS20 encodes a component of the ribosomal 40 S subunit, but the mechanism by which the variants might influence CRC risk remains unclear. The current study assessed the association of RPS20 variants with CRC predisposition in whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data from 9738 CRC cases and 161,403 cancer-free controls from the COloRectal tumour Gene Identification consortium (CORGI) study, 100,000 Genomes (100kGP) and UK Biobank (UKB). One hundred and sixty-eight CORGI cases and 23 100kGP cases were recruited based on a family history of CRC. After excluding common polymorphisms, we identified one putative loss-of-function RPS20 variant in cases (p.Ile89fs), and none in controls. This individual was not from a multiplex family, and hence co-segregation analysis of the variant and disease was not possible. One in-frame deletion and one missense variant predicted to be probably pathogenic were found in controls. We also reviewed the evidence on RPS20 and CRC risk from the literature. We concluded that the combined data do not show conclusively that RPS20 is a proven CRC predisposition gene. Its inclusion in diagnostic gene panels for CRC cannot be justified until and unless stronger supporting evidence becomes available in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42274899What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.