ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2026
Romosozumab for cancer treatment-induced bone loss in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a case series.
Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Author Response to "Interpreting romosozumab for cancer treatment-induced bone loss: measurement, missing data, and surveillance".Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
- Interpreting romosozumab for cancer treatment-induced bone loss: measurement, missing data, and surveillance.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Romosozumab was associated with increases in bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL). No clinical signals of fracture occurrence or cancer recurrence were observed; however, these findings are based on a small retrospective case series and require confirmation in larger prospective studies.
backgroundCancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) is a major complication in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitor therapy. Although antiresorptive agents are commonly used, some patients continue to experience progressive bone loss or fragility fractures. Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody against sclerostin, has demonstrated efficacy in postmenopausal osteoporosis; however, clinical data in patients with cancer remain limited.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 22 postmenopausal women with clinically non-metastatic (Stage I-III) hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who received romosozumab for CTIBL at a single institution. Romosozumab was administered for 12 months in patients with progressive bone loss, new fragility fractures, or high fracture risk. All patients received concomitant calcium and/or active vitamin D supplementation. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers, and tumor markers (CA15-3, CEA) were evaluated. Differences in skeletal response were also evaluated between treatment-naïve patients and those with prior exposure to bone-modifying agents. Clinical outcomes, including new fragility fractures and cancer recurrence, were assessed during follow-up.
resultsThe mean age of the patients was 66.8 years, and the mean duration of aromatase inhibitor therapy prior to treatment was 35.3 months to 36.9 months. After 12 months of romosozumab treatment, lumbar spine BMD increased by 11.5% (P < 0.001), and total hip BMD increased by 4.1% (P = 0.002). Changes in bone turnover markers were observed, consistent with the known mechanism of action of romosozumab. No new fragility fractures were observed during the treatment period. During a mean follow-up period of 38.3 months (including the 12-month treatment period), tumor markers remained stable, and no clinical evidence of cancer recurrence was observed.
conclusionsIn this small retrospective case series, romosozumab was associated with increases in BMD in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and CTIBL. No clinical signals suggestive of short-term oncological deterioration were observed; however, given the limited sample size, retrospective design, and lack of a control group, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are required to better define the efficacy and safety of romosozumab in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42274886What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.