Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42274883›Full record

ReviewJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026

Work Disability and Rehabilitation in Workers with Hearing Loss: A Scoping Review.

Trishna Chauhan, Dialechti Tsimpida

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Trishna ChauhanSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Lancashire, Lancashire, UK. TChauhan4@lancashire.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6017-3665
Dialechti TsimpidaDivision of Public Health and Epidemiology, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3709-5651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs organisations increasingly prioritise inclusive employment, more people with disabilities are entering the workforce. Hearing loss, a common yet often invisible disability, presents a significant and under-recognised occupational health challenge. This scoping review synthesises evidence on how individuals with hearing loss navigate workplace demands and examines the implications for occupational health policy and practice.

methodsA scoping review of literature published between 2010 and 2025 was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidance. Systematic searches were completed across Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Web of Science to identify studies examining hearing loss in relation to work participation and occupational health outcomes. Eligible studies were synthesised using thematic analysis.

resultsThirty-four studies met inclusion criteria across diverse countries and occupational settings. Four interrelated themes were identified: (1) individual strategies for managing hearing loss at work, including communication approaches and decisions around disclosure; (2) workplace accommodations, encompassing technological and environmental supports, training and organisational initiatives, and social connectedness, alongside persistent gaps between policy intent and practice; (3) occupational health and wellbeing outcomes, including psychosocial impacts, work-related fatigue, need for recovery, identity negotiation, and occupational stress; and (4) multi-level recommendations addressing individual, organisational, and policy domains to support sustainable employment.

conclusionHearing loss in the workplace presents substantial occupational health implications, including psychosocial stress, communication barriers, and increased need for recovery after work. Workplace accommodations show potential to support inclusion and improve health outcomes, yet implementation remains inconsistent. Further research is needed to rigorously evaluate occupational health interventions and accommodations, particularly within low- and middle-income contexts where evidence is limited.

Indexed as

DisabilityEmploymentHearing lossOccupational healthPsychosocial stressorsWork participationWorkplace accommodations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.