Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42274882›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2026

Machine Learning Aided Kinematic Profiling of Reaching Movements Separates Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 12 and Essential Tremor.

Asit Baran Bayen, Supriyo Choudhury, Suchismita Majumdar, Anna Baines, Arkaprabha Basu, Kaustav Das, Debapriya Mukherjee, Dipanwita Santra, Siddhartha Sankar Mondal, Sattwika Banerjee and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Asit Baran BayenDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neurosciences Kolkata, 185/1 A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700017, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6191-391X
Supriyo ChoudhuryDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neurosciences Kolkata, 185/1 A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700017, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8624-8258
Suchismita MajumdarDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neurosciences Kolkata, 185/1 A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700017, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3420-3840
Anna BainesFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6651-7248
Arkaprabha BasuElectronics and Communication Sciences Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0136-0887
Kaustav DasDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neurosciences Kolkata, 185/1 A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700017, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5551-1441
Debapriya MukherjeeDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neurosciences Kolkata, 185/1 A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700017, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4983-3462
Dipanwita SantraDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neurosciences Kolkata, 185/1 A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700017, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9439-6100
Siddhartha Sankar MondalDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neurosciences Kolkata, 185/1 A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700017, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4682-6344
Sattwika BanerjeeDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neurosciences Kolkata, 185/1 A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700017, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1313-8743
Jacky GangulyDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neurosciences Kolkata, 185/1 A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700017, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5098-3311
Purba BasuDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neurosciences Kolkata, 185/1 A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700017, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3383-3264
Sanjit DeyDepartment of Physiology, UGC CPEPA, UGC-CRNN, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6534-0522
Swagatam DasElectronics and Communication Sciences Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6843-4508
Mark R BakerFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6916-1329
Stuart N BakerFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8118-4048
Hrishikesh KumarDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neurosciences Kolkata, 185/1 A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700017, India. rishi_medicine@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9789-7832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper limb postural tremor is common in both Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 12 (SCA12) and Essential Tremor (ET). In the early stages, their clinical presentation can be similar, leading to potential misdiagnosis. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a low-cost device and methods to quantify 2D reaching kinematics objectively, with the goal of improving differentiation between ET and SCA12 using machine learning (ML) models. We recruited 48 participants, including 16 SCA12 patients, 16 ET patients, and 16 healthy controls (HC). Clinical severity was scored using TETRAS and SARA scales. A Raspberry Pi-based device was used to record upper limb reaching during a button-press task. The videos were processed with DeepLabCut and six 2D kinematic parameters were extracted via MATLAB scripts. We expanded the dataset using Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN). Classification was performed using multiple ML algorithms, with and without GAN-based data augmentation. Both patient cohorts showed significant alterations in kinematic features compared to HC, with SCA12 demonstrating more pronounced abnormality. Kinematic parameters including maximum reaching speed, endpoint precision, and time fraction to peak speed emerged as potential markers for differentiating ET and SCA12. The ML models demonstrated high classification performance in distinguishing HC from patients (CA 88.9%) and SCA12 from ET (CA 83.3%) using original data. The device-guided reaching kinematics provide objective markers of motor impairment. Combined with ML, this approach could enhance diagnostic accuracy; it also has potential for remote monitoring and as an outcome measure in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Essential TremorMachine LearningSpinocerebellar AtaxiasAdultAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleGenerative Adversarial NetworksHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovementEssential Tremor (ET)Machine learning (ML) classification modelsMotion tracking deviceSpinocerebellar ataxia type 12 (SCA12)Upper limb reaching kinematics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.