ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2026
Machine Learning Aided Kinematic Profiling of Reaching Movements Separates Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 12 and Essential Tremor.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upper limb postural tremor is common in both Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 12 (SCA12) and Essential Tremor (ET). In the early stages, their clinical presentation can be similar, leading to potential misdiagnosis. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a low-cost device and methods to quantify 2D reaching kinematics objectively, with the goal of improving differentiation between ET and SCA12 using machine learning (ML) models. We recruited 48 participants, including 16 SCA12 patients, 16 ET patients, and 16 healthy controls (HC). Clinical severity was scored using TETRAS and SARA scales. A Raspberry Pi-based device was used to record upper limb reaching during a button-press task. The videos were processed with DeepLabCut and six 2D kinematic parameters were extracted via MATLAB scripts. We expanded the dataset using Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN). Classification was performed using multiple ML algorithms, with and without GAN-based data augmentation. Both patient cohorts showed significant alterations in kinematic features compared to HC, with SCA12 demonstrating more pronounced abnormality. Kinematic parameters including maximum reaching speed, endpoint precision, and time fraction to peak speed emerged as potential markers for differentiating ET and SCA12. The ML models demonstrated high classification performance in distinguishing HC from patients (CA 88.9%) and SCA12 from ET (CA 83.3%) using original data. The device-guided reaching kinematics provide objective markers of motor impairment. Combined with ML, this approach could enhance diagnostic accuracy; it also has potential for remote monitoring and as an outcome measure in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42274882What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.