ArticleDiscover mental health2026
Acceptance, needs and demands of e-mental health interventions in adolescent elite athletes.
Article in Discover mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElite sports place high psychological and physical demands on adolescent elite athletes, increasing the risk for mental health problems. E-mental health interventions may offer flexible and low-threshold support. This study investigated adolescent elite athletes' acceptance of e-mental health interventions, identified predictors of acceptance, and explored their specific needs and demands.
methodsData from N = 217 adolescent elite athletes (age range: 14-17 years) participating in a web-based survey (March 2022-March 2023) were analyzed. Frequencies for preferred program features and delivery modes were calculated. Acceptance and its predictors were examined using an extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. Group comparisons (t-tests, ANOVAs) and hierarchical regression analyses were conducted.
resultsOverall acceptance of e-mental health interventions was moderate. Female athletes and those in individual sports indicated higher acceptance than male and team-sport athletes. Gender (β = 0.097, p = .017), the UTAUT predictors performance expectancy (β = 0.458, p < .001), effort expectancy (β = 0.309, p < .001), and social influence (β = 0.152, p = .015) significantly explained variance in acceptance in adolescent elite athletes, whereas sport type, depression-, anxiety-, and distress symptoms, internet anxiety, digital confidence, and -overload were not significant predictors. Preferred interventions were customizable, delivered via smartphone app, and completed in 10-20-minutes sessions.
conclusionsFindings highlight the need for user-centered, flexible e-mental health interventions tailored to adolescent elite athletes. Targeting key acceptance drivers and preferred design features may support sustained engagement and inform indicated prevention strategies in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.