SynthesisPediatric surgery international2026
Early vs. delayed feeding after pediatric gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe adoption of early feeding after pediatric gastrointestinal surgery remains inconsistent due to concerns regarding anastomotic safety.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted comparing early enteral feeding (initiation within 48 h) with delayed feeding in patients < 18 years undergoing intestinal anastomosis or stoma reversal.
resultsEight trials comprising 704 patients (323 early feeding, 381 delayed) were included across neonatal and pediatric elective surgical populations. Early feeding significantly shortened hospital length of stay (mean difference - 3.53 days; 95% CI - 4.35 to - 2.71) and reduced time to full feeds (mean difference - 3.15 days; 95% CI - 3.89 to - 2.40). There was no significant difference in anastomotic leakage (log risk ratio - 0.36; 95% CI - 1.23 to 0.51; I²=0%) or postoperative vomiting (log risk ratio - 0.02; 95% CI - 0.41 to 0.38). Early feeding was also associated with fewer wound infections (log risk ratio - 0.85; 95% CI - 1.48 to - 0.22).
conclusionsOverall, early enteral feeding after pediatric gastrointestinal surgery appears safe and confers clinically meaningful benefits by accelerating nutritional recovery, reducing infectious complications, and shortening hospitalization, supporting its incorporation into pediatric postoperative care pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.