ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2026
Evaluation of fire extinguisher dry powder as an "in situ" development powder for latent fingermarks.
Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Latent fingermarks are present on surfaces of evidence items in many cases. However, current fingermark development methods fail to detect all the invisible fingermarks, and it can be very time consuming and labour-intensive when processing large crime scenes and bulky evidence items with large surface areas. In this study, an "in situ" latent fingermark detection method that makes use of dry powder from a fire extinguisher was evaluated. Its selectivity and sensitivity were compared with those of the current fingermark development methods using traditional fingerprint powders and cyanoacrylate fuming. Powders in three commercial brands of fire extinguishers were first characterized using scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDX). The analysis revealed the diverse morphological characteristics of the powders, ranging from curved, irregular to sharp-edged forms. This study involved the development and evaluation of over 1700 fingermarks deposited by three donors. Similar to traditional fingerprint powders, Eversafe fire extinguisher dry powder displayed notable superiority in developing sebaceous and natural fingermarks by giving sufficient ridge details and clear secondary details on various glass substrates, whereas cyanoacrylate fuming proved to be less effective in comparison. Even for old fingermarks aged up to 12 weeks old, over 88% had a grade of 3 or 4 and were categorized as "useful" for potential identification, which has provided preliminary evidence for the feasibility of using fire extinguisher dry powders for the development of latent fingermarks. The results indicated that the fingermark detection method was quick, simple and cost-effective, highlighting the need for further investigation into the capabilities and limitations of this approach using a larger cohort of donors to simulate operational conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42274782What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.