Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42274734›Full record

ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2026

[Anti-infectious cross-linking: when and how? : PACK-CXL as treatment option for infectious keratitis].

F Hafezi, M Hillen, N Hafezi, L Kollros, E A Torres-Netto, M L Depczyńska

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

F HafeziELZA Institute, Bahnhofplatz 15, 8001, Zürich, Schweiz. farhad@hafezi.ch.
M HillenELZA Institute, Bahnhofplatz 15, 8001, Zürich, Schweiz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1277-9309
N HafeziELZA Institute, Bahnhofplatz 15, 8001, Zürich, Schweiz.
L KollrosELZA Institute, Bahnhofplatz 15, 8001, Zürich, Schweiz.
E A Torres-NettoELZA Institute, Bahnhofplatz 15, 8001, Zürich, Schweiz.
M L DepczyńskaELZA Institute, Bahnhofplatz 15, 8001, Zürich, Schweiz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfectious keratitis remains a major cause of blindness worldwide. Conventional antimicrobial treatment is not always sufficient, particularly against drug-resistant pathogens. Photoactivated chromophore for keratitis-corneal cross-linking (PACK-CXL) offers a promising adjunctive or alternative treatment.

methodsNarrative review based on the current literature and clinical experience, covering mechanisms of action, clinical evidence, protocol selection and practical decision-making criteria for PACK-CXL.

resultsThe PACK-CXL acts via three mechanisms: direct killing of pathogens through reactive oxygen species (ROS), increased resistance to protease digestion through steric hindrance and anti-inflammatory effects. Clinical studies demonstrated that adjuvant PACK-CXL shortens the healing time and as monotherapy achieves approximately 89% success in small bacterial ulcers. Higher total radiation doses (high fluence, ≥ 7.2 J/cm

conclusionThe use of PACK-CXL enables rapid, largely pathogen-independent treatment of infectious keratitis. Protocol selection should be guided by ulcer size, depth and pathogen type. Accelerated high-fluence protocols are particularly suitable for antimicrobial use.

Indexed as

Corneal Cross-LinkingCross-Linking ReagentsEye Infections, BacterialKeratitisPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsHumansRiboflavinCross-Linking ReagentsPhotosensitizing AgentsRiboflavinAcanthamoeba keratitisCorneal infectionHealing timeRiboflavinRose bengal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.