Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42274691›Full record

ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Recent Advancements in Metal-Free Carbon-Based Catalysts: A Challenge in Sustainable Fine Chemical Synthesis.

Elena Pérez-Mayoral, Mounia Al Bahri, Ines Matos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elena Pérez-MayoralDepartamento de Química Inorgánica y Química Técnica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Urbanización Monte Rozas, Avenida Esparta s/n, Ctra. de Las Rozas al Escorial Km 5, 28232 Madrid, Spain.
Mounia Al BahriDepartamento de Química Inorgánica y Química Técnica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Urbanización Monte Rozas, Avenida Esparta s/n, Ctra. de Las Rozas al Escorial Km 5, 28232 Madrid, Spain.
Ines MatosLAQV, Associated Laboratory for Green Chemistry, Chemistry Department, NOVA School of Science and Technology | NOVA FCT, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.

Funding

FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/50006/2025, UID/PRR/50006/2025 and LA/P/0008/2020MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 PID2024-157816OB-C22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of metal-free porous carbon catalysts can be considered one of the best alternatives for implementing a more sustainable fine chemical synthesis, as a challenge necessary to protect both our planet and society. It is recognized that the selection of the appropriate functional carbon catalyst, operating under the optimal reaction conditions, undoubtedly improves both the conversion and selectivity of a great variety of distinctive organic transformations, often through cascade reactions or even multicomponent synthesis. Increasing our knowledge of synthetic methodologies for metal-free carbon-based materials (including many of them on a large scale or even at an industrial scale), available characterization techniques, and computational methods represents an excellent opportunity to make these types of materials promising catalysts for a more sustainable future. In this context, this review is addressed to revisit the benefits and limitations of using each type of metal-free porous carbon catalyst in fine chemical synthesis, particularly in multi-bond forming processes for the synthesis of relevant heterocyclic systems.

Indexed as

carbon catalystsfine chemicalsmetal free catalystsustainable chemistry

Identifiers

PMID42274691
PMCPMC13257754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.