ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Application of Machine Learning in Predicting the Properties of Two-Dimensional Semiconductor Materials.
Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid evolution of next-generation electronics urgently demands high-performance functional materials. Two-dimensional (2D) semiconductors, characterized by tunable bandgaps, magnetic properties, and excellent optical and electronic properties, hold significant potential for applications in nanoelectronic devices, magnetic storage, and optoelectronics. However, the high computational cost of traditional Density Functional Theory (DFT) severely restricts large-scale high-throughput screening. Meanwhile, problems such as insufficient datasets and non-uniform data quality remain prevalent. Against this background, machine learning (ML), which captures intricate nonlinear correlations and accelerates the discovery of novel materials, has emerged as an efficient technical approach. This review systematically summarizes recent advances in ML-driven property prediction for 2D semiconductors. It first elaborates the fundamental properties and classifications of 2D semiconductors, and then compares traditional computational simulations with ML algorithms, clarifying the distinct advantages of data-driven approaches. Subsequently, this work focuses on the latest progress in predicting critical properties, including bandgap, magnetism, and other physical characteristics. For bandgap prediction, classical algorithms such as random forests are compared with deep learning models represented by graph neural networks. The results demonstrate that deep learning performs much better in low-data regimes and complex material systems. For magnetic property prediction, the impact of feature engineering strategies on model accuracy and efficiency is systematically analyzed. In addition, the research progress of other physical property prediction tasks is briefly summarized. Finally, future research directions for machine learning, including standardized materials databases, physics-informed machine learning, multimodal modeling, and the integration of machine learning with experimental and theoretical methods, are outlined to address challenges in data quality, model interpretability, and cross-system generalization ability. This work aims to provide a systematic theoretical foundation and methodological guidance for research on two-dimensional semiconductor materials assisted by machine learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.