ReviewCells2026
Artificial Intelligence in Tumor Evolution: Understanding Cancer Complexity Through Multi-Modal Data Integration in Precision Oncology.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning and computational approaches to model therapeutic response and resistance in diffuse midline glioma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- Melanoma Intelligence: Explainable AI Reveals Histopathologic Aggressiveness as the Dominant Axis of Lymph-Node Metastasis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Environmental Carcinogenesis as a Stochastic Evolutionary Failure of Senescence-Control Systems.Cells · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer research has undergone a fundamental transformation in recent decades due to the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) models into the study of tumor biology. However, tumor evolution, driven by genetic and phenotypic alterations leading to heterogeneity, resistance and metastasis, remains a major challenge in oncology. To understand these processes is crucial for developing effective therapeutic strategies and improving patient outcomes. Conventional methods often fail to capture the complexity and dynamics of these processes. In contrast, AI tools have the ability to integrate and analyze large-scale multi-omics, imaging and clinical data, offering the capability to decode tumor complexity. AI-driven methods facilitate multi-modal data integration, enabling the recognition of patterns that connect molecular alterations with phenotypic outcomes. In functional genomics, AI tools predict the effects of genetic variants, identify regulatory elements and map dysregulated pathways, thus clarifying mechanisms underlying tumor development and resistance. In the imaging field, deep learning techniques improve tumor segmentation, characterization and longitudinal monitoring, providing more accurate insights into tumor progression and treatment response. Predictive modeling could allow the anticipation of tumor evolution and drug response, supporting adaptive therapeutic plans and real-time treatment adjustments. Moreover, AI supports biomarker discovery, patient stratification and decision support systems that can improve clinical trial design and accelerate the development of personalized therapies. However, these advances raise important ethical challenges, including data privacy, algorithmic bias and the preservation of patient autonomy. Addressing these concerns is essential to ensure the responsible deployment of AI in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.