ArticleActa odontologica Scandinavica2026
Comparative evaluation of apical root resorption in adult patients treated with clear aligners and fixed orthodontic appliances using CBCT.
Article in Acta odontologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrthodontically induced external apical root resorption is a common iatrogenic effect of tooth movement. With the increasing use of clear aligner therapy, it is important to evaluate whether its biomechanics reduce root resorption compared with fixed orthodontic appliances.
aimTo compare apical root resorption in patients treated with clear aligners and fixed appliances using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODOLOGY: A retrospective comparative CBCT-based analysis was conducted on 120 orthodontic patients. Root volumes and lengths were measured from the cementoenamel junction to the apex using pre- and post-treatment CBCT scans. Apical root resorption was quantified as percentage volume loss and absolute root length reduction. Primary analyses employed linear mixed-effects models adjusted for clustering of teeth within patients and for tooth type, arch, extraction status, and treatment duration.
resultsClear aligner therapy was associated with significantly lower apical root resorption than fixed appliances. Mean percentage root volume loss was lower in the aligner group (6.1 ± 4.8%) than in the fixed appliance group (8.4 ± 6.1%) (p = 0.004). Mean root length reduction was also smaller with aligners (p = 0.001). Clinically significant root resorption occurred less frequently in the aligner group (p = 0.048). Longer treatment duration increased resorption risk.
conclusionClear aligner therapy is associated with less apical root resorption than fixed orthodontic treatment, while treatment duration remains an independent risk factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.