Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42274311›Full record

ArticleFuture cardiology2026

Best practices in specialized hypertrophic cardiomyopathy centers in the United States: a survey of cardiologists, nurses, pharmacists, patients, and patient advocates.

Martin Maron, Barbara Steeves, Andrew Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martin MaronLahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.
Barbara SteevesUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-0037-4705
Andrew WangDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis survey gained insights into best practices and challenges at specialized hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) centers in the US to inform improvements in clinical practice and patient care, and support those without proximity to specialized centers.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative survey of eligible health care providers employed at comprehensive HCM centers. Institutions offered septal reduction therapies, implantable cardioverter defibrillator implants, and heart transplants. Patients and a patient advocacy group were also interviewed.

resultsA high degree of consistency in care team structure and standardization of processes for HCM diagnosis, including imaging and management, was observed. Patient and care team education on treatments, including cardiac myosin inhibitors, was critical for informed decision-making and efficiency. Further primary cardiology education could include HCM detection and management, including assessing sudden death risk. Community setting education was recognized as important for continuity of care. Major challenges included funding, and lack of dedicated HCM teams including administrative staff, ancillary specialists, and experienced sonographers.

conclusionsDiagnostic testing expertise and understanding of optimal processes, including different treatment options, are important to improve quality of care and outcomes. Select management considerations and best practices from comprehensive HCM centers may be adoptable by primary cardiology centers and providers.

Indexed as

CardiologistsCardiomyopathy, HypertrophicPharmacistsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statescardiac myosin inhibitorcareHypertrophic cardiomyopathymanagementtreatment

Identifiers

PMID42274311
PMCPMC13285542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.