Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42274297›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026

Sound Guides Object Size Choices in African Penguins Through Pitch-Size Association.

Francesca Terranova, Francesca D'Orazio, Cristina Pilenga, Luigi Baciadonna, David Reby, Livio Favaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesca TerranovaDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1060-3756
Francesca D'OrazioDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8808-6794
Cristina PilengaZoomarine Openature Rome, Torvaianica, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4883-092X
Luigi BaciadonnaDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0011-801X
David RebyENES Bioacoustics Research Laboratory, Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre (CRNL), Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9261-1711
Livio FavaroDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8698-472X

Funding

D.R. was partially supported by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) of the University of Saint-Etienne, the Institut Universitaire de France, and the Labex CeLyA.F.T. was supported by the University of Turin through a PON PhD scholarship (REACT-EU FSE DM 1061)L.B. was supported by a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (FEAR-BEES -101065873) during writing.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain's ability to associate information from different sensory modalities, known as cross-modal integration, is crucial for forming a coherent perception of objects and events. When such associations follow systematic and predictable patterns, they are referred to as cross-modal correspondences. Humans, for example, tend to associate large objects with low-pitched sounds and small objects with high-pitched sounds, a phenomenon known as pitch-size cross-modal correspondence. This phenomenon has been documented in several vertebrate species, yet direct experimental evidence in avian species remains comparatively limited. Here, we tested African penguins using a preferential choice paradigm in which individuals chose between two cubes of different sizes after hearing either a high- or low-pitched sound. Following passive exposure to congruent pitch-size pairings, penguins chose larger objects following low-pitched sounds and smaller objects following high-pitched sounds, indicating that auditory pitch guided their visual size choices. Given that individuals were pre-exposed to a limited set of pitch-size pairings, this effect may reflect either a preexisting bias consistent with cross-modal correspondences or the generalization of a learned association. Nevertheless, these findings demonstrate that penguins can integrate auditory and visual information to guide their behavior and generalize a systematic pitch-size relationship across sensory dimensions.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorPitch PerceptionSoundSpheniscidaeAcoustic StimulationAnimalsFemaleMalebioacousticsbird cognitionmultimodal associationSpheniscus demersus

Identifiers

PMID42274297
PMCPMC13255747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.