ArticleAIDS (London, England)2026
Residential mobility and health among people with hiv: a scoping review.
Article in AIDS (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo synthesize the available evidence and identify gaps in the literature on residential mobility and health among people with HIV.
designScoping review.
methodsWe included original research articles, reviews, editorials and commentaries that addressed residential mobility among people with HIV and that were published in English or Spanish between 2010-2025. We extracted key information including the study population, study design, definition of residential mobility, measurement of residential mobility, health outcomes, and main results.
resultsWe identified 17 original research articles and 7 review articles or commentaries meeting the inclusion criteria. Definitions of residential mobility and measurement approaches differed across the included studies. Only 8 studies measured contextual factors, such as the distance moved or reason for moving, and 5 studies compared residential mobility across subgroups of people with HIV. In 3 tracing studies, residential mobility was the most frequently reported reason for loss to clinic. Associations with other care continuum outcomes, including treatment initiation, adherence, viral suppression, and mortality, were mixed, highlighting the complex and context-dependent relationship between mobility and health among people with HIV.
conclusionsWhile residential mobility is recognized as an important driver of care continuum outcomes among people with HIV, further research is needed to elucidate the relevant causal pathways and identify opportunities for intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.