Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42273994›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Tactile localization of the breast, areola, and nipple.

Katie H Long, Emily E Fitzgerald, Ev I Berger-Wolf, Amani Fawaz, Stacy T Lindau, Sliman J Bensmaia, Charles M Greenspon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katie H LongCommittee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.
Emily E FitzgeraldDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.
Ev I Berger-WolfDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.
Amani FawazDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.
Stacy T LindauDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9054-6538
Sliman J Bensmaia *Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4039-9135
Charles M Greenspon *Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6806-3302

Funding

Sensory mechanisms of manual dexterity and their application to neuroprostheticsR35NS122333 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI HATSOPOULOS, NICHOLAS G · 2021 to 2024
$4.5M
Bionic Breast Project: A Neuroprosthesis to Restore Touch Sensation and Reduce Chronic Pain After MastectomyR01CA281301 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Stacy Tessler Lindau · 2023 to 2026
$3.2M
Bionic Breast Project: Towards Restoring Breast Sensory Function in Women with MastectomyR21CA226726 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BENSMAIA, SLIMAN, LINDAU, STACY TESSLER · 2019 to 2020
$382k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA281301NCI NIH HHS R01CA281301NCI NIH HHS R21 CA226726NCI NIH HHS R21CA226726NINDS NIH HHS NS122333NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS122333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Touch plays a key role in our perception of our body and shapes our interactions with the world, from the objects we manipulate to the people we touch. While the tactile sensibility of the hand has been extensively characterized, much less is known about touch on other parts of the body. Despite the important role of the breast in lactation, as well as in affective and sexual touch, relatively little is known about its sensory properties. To fill this gap, we investigated the ability of women to locate touches on the breast and compared it to that of the hand and back, body regions that span the range of tactile discriminative capabilities. First, we found that the tactile precision of the breast was even lower than that of the back, heretofore the paragon of poor precision. Second, precision was lower for breasts that had undergone greater expansion, consistent with the hypothesis that innervation capacity does not scale with body size. Third, touches to different regions of the nipple were largely indistinguishable, suggesting sparse innervation density. Fourth, localization errors were systematically biased toward the nipple.

Indexed as

BreastNipplesTouchTouch PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansYoung Adultaffectivebreasthumanneurosciencetouch

Identifiers

PMID42273994
PMCPMC13258733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.