ArticleNucleic acids research2026
Sustained PRC1.1 activity preserves gene repression independently of PRC2.2 and restrains leukemic cell differentiation.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Loss-of-function mutations in BCOR, a subunit of the non-canonical Polycomb Repressive Complex 1.1 (PRC1.1), are frequently observed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and associate with adverse risk. Paradoxically, leukemic stem cell viability in BCOR wild-type AMLs strongly depends on PRC1.1 activity. Here, we use BCOR and KDM2B degron models to study PRC1.1 dependency in leukemic cells and find that BCOR is a bridging factor tethering the catalytic and chromatin-binding moieties of the PRC1.1 complex. BCOR degradation induces a quick localized loss of H2AK119ub at PRC1.1 target genes, whereas PRC2-induced H3K27me3 remains unaffected. Degron-mediated depletion of BCOR or KDM2B induces a rapid but time-dependent transcriptional induction, whereby late-upregulated genes are more heavily decorated with H3K27me3 compared to early-upregulated genes. Combined PRC1.1 inactivation and PRC2 inhibition further amplifies gene induction, suggesting collaborative yet distinct control over target genes. Strikingly, both JARID2/AEBP2 and SUZ12 knockout cells, devoid of PRC2.2 or PRC2.1/PRC2.2 respectively, retain PRC1.1 loss-induced transcriptional activation, underscoring that PRC1.1 can repress target genes independently of a downstream PRC2.2-canonical PRC1 repressive axis. Finally, combined targeting of PRC1.1 and PRC2 induces differentiation of leukemic cells, emphasizing that co-targeting PRC1.1 and PRC2 represents a promising strategy to improve treatment of AML patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.