ReviewAnnals of palliative medicine2026
The evolving role and impact of patient navigators in serious illness care: a narrative review.
Review in Annals of palliative medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveIn today's increasingly complex and fragmented healthcare system, patient navigation has emerged as a strategy to improve access to palliative care and reduce health inequities among historically marginalized populations. This narrative review aims to examine the evolution of patient navigation and its implementation across care settings to identify key themes and opportunities to optimize outcomes and reduce disparities in patients with serious illnesses.
methodsA literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Ultimate, and Google Scholar by three independent investigators on articles related to patient navigation in palliative care and patients with serious illnesses. A total of 49 academic articles and 5 additional articles were included. KEY CONTENT AND
findingsA review of the literature revealed a number of diverse models of care navigation and implementation strategies. Navigation models involved varying degrees of community-based personnel and healthcare professionals from a range of disciplines. Through culturally informed support, education, and empowerment, many of these programs demonstrated improved patient outcomes such as reduced symptom burden, increased advance care planning, improved hospice referrals, more goal-concordant care at the end of life, reduced end-of-life cost expenditure, hospitalizations and emergency room visits. Integration of navigation across both medical and community settings also helped to reduce health disparities by addressing barriers across multiple levels of influence. However, in order for such models to be successful, understanding and integration of cultural values, trusted community figures, and strategies for addressing language barriers are essential.
conclusionsWhile a variety of approaches to patient navigation can help improve care for seriously ill patients, common themes of effective interventions include social connection, engagement in what is most meaningful to the patient, identification of patient needs, access to culturally grounded resources, patient advocacy and empowerment, incorporation of navigators embedded within the local community, and support from key stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.