ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Beyond the chimeric antigen receptor T cells and bispecific antibody duopoly: ex vivo armed T cells for solid tumors.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) continue to dominate the overall immunotherapy landscape, the field of T-cell-based therapeutics is rapidly evolving. Although chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) currently represent the pillars of T-cell-directed therapy, the complexity of solid tumors demands a more diversified therapeutic arsenal. By combining antibody-mediated tumor targeting with the robust effector function of ex vivo expanded T cells, BsAb-armed T cells (BATs)-also referred to as Ex vivo Armed T cell (EATs)-provide a 'third way' that addresses the unmet needs of solid tumor immunotherapy. They can overcome the quantitative and qualitative deficiencies of endogenous immune effector cells in cancer patients. By offering personalized multi-antigen targetability and the prospect of off-the-shelf therapy, EATs have the potential to address critical challenges, such as poor tumor infiltration, immune escape via heterogeneity and target antigen loss, and treatment-related toxicities like cytokine release syndrome. In this review, we discuss the characteristics of EAT therapy, distinct from CAR-T and BsAb therapy, as an independent and alternative niche. We explore strategies to accelerate their clinical translation, encompassing BsAb optimization, modulation of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and cytokines, and simultaneous engagement of multiple antigens, which are essential for boosting EAT potency and overcoming the limitations of solid tumors. In this evolving landscape, EATs could play a unique and independent role, expanding the CAR-T and BsAb-dominated paradigm to address unmet clinical needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.