Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42273673›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2026

Influenza vaccination and cardiovascular and respiratory outcomes in high-risk populations: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyzes.

Chengyan Jin, Yan Zhang, Bin Wang, Peiyan Hua

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chengyan JinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Bin WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Peiyan HuaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Influenza infection is an important trigger of acute cardiovascular events and respiratory decompensation in vulnerable populations. Although influenza vaccination may reduce cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality, the overall certainty and methodological reliability of the evidence remain unclear. Objective: To synthesize and critically evaluate published systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the effectiveness and safety of influenza vaccination in populations at high risk of cardiovascular and respiratory complications. Methods: We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses identified through PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to December 1, 2025. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2, evidence certainty using GRADE, and overlap of primary studies using citation matrices and corrected covered area (CCA). Given heterogeneity and review overlap, we performed a narrative synthesis and applied predefined rules to prioritize representative reviews. Results: Fourteen systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. The strongest evidence supported an association between influenza vaccination and reduced major cardiovascular risk, particularly major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with ischemic heart disease and acute coronary syndrome. Vaccination was also associated with reduced cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality in some high-risk populations. In respiratory high-risk populations, vaccination was associated with fewer COPD exacerbations and lower laboratory-confirmed influenza incidence among older adults. Across an evidence base covering more than 230 million participants, no clear increase in serious adverse events was observed. The highest-certainty evidence was concentrated in selected cardiovascular and influenza-related outcomes, whereas stroke and several respiratory outcomes remained moderate to low in certainty because of heterogeneity and mixed study designs. Conclusion: Influenza vaccination appears to be a safe and clinically meaningful preventive strategy in populations at high risk of cardiopulmonary complications. The strongest current evidence supports selected cardiovascular endpoints and influenza-related outcomes. This umbrella review provides an integrated synthesis of cardiovascular, respiratory, and safety outcomes while explicitly addressing review quality, overlap of primary studies, and certainty of evidence. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251267371.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicRisk FactorsSystematic Reviews as TopicVaccinationInfluenza Vaccinescardiovascular diseaseinfluenza vaccinerespiratory outcomessecondary preventionumbrella review

Identifiers

PMID42273673
PMCPMC13246626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.