ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Social capital and community resilience in disaster contexts: a multiple case study from Colombia.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study analyses the role of social capital in community resilience to disasters. Although there is broad consensus on its importance, there is still a need to distinguish the specific contribution of its different forms (bonding, bridging, and linking) throughout the phases of the risk management cycle (preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation). Methods: To address this gap, a multiple case study with a qualitative approach was developed, comparing three communities exposed to hydrometeorological risk in Colombia: Salgar and Mocoa, municipalities impacted by the country's deadliest flash floods in the last decade, and La Primavera, a community with high exposure to risk where a major disaster has not yet occurred. Results: The findings confirm the centrality of social capital in community resilience throughout all phases of the risk cycle and broaden understanding of the phenomenon by identifying psychosocial processes, such as collective memory and social learning, that mediate this relationship. The analysis shows differentiated and complementary effects of each type of social capital evidencing that the sustainability of resilience depends on its dynamic articulation within collaborative risk governance frameworks. Likewise, the results suggest that, although disasters can weaken binding social capital, the bonds that persist constitute the basis for rebuilding the social fabric through solidarity practices and shared norms. Discussion: The study shows that social capital is an important condition for community resilience, but not sufficient on its own, as resilience also depends on other types of capital and on institutional and governance factors. In this regard, limits and ambivalent effects of social capital on risk management are identified. Finally, the research contributes to the literature by highlighting its relevance in the mitigation phase, which has traditionally been less explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.