Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42273625›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Educational anxiety and student mental health in the era of artificial intelligence: a multi-source data fusion analysis in smart education.

Qing Tian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Qing TianSchool of Art, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Against the backdrop of the rapid advancement of educational digitalization and the growing prominence of student mental health issues, this study develops an integrated model of "technology perception-educational anxiety-student mental health" to examine the mechanisms through which perceived usefulness, perceived fairness, and perceived controllability are associated with student mental health. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire design was adopted, and data were collected from university students through a combination of online and offline surveys from July to September 2025, yielding 380 valid responses. Based on these quantitative data, structural equation modeling and artificial neural network techniques were employed to test the proposed hypotheses. Results: The results indicate that perceived usefulness, perceived fairness, and perceived controllability are all significantly and positively associated with student mental health, whereas educational anxiety is significantly and negatively associated with student mental health. All three dimensions of technology perception significantly reduce educational anxiety and indirectly promote student mental health through this mediating pathway, with perceived fairness and perceived controllability showing relatively stronger associations. Sensitivity analysis using the artificial neural network further reveals that perceived fairness is the most important predictor of educational anxiety, followed by perceived controllability and perceived usefulness. Discussion: This study enriches the theoretical understanding of student mental health in AI-enabled educational contexts and provides empirical implications for educational technology optimization, algorithm governance, and student mental health interventions.

Indexed as

AnxietyArtificial IntelligenceMental HealthStudentsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung Adultartificial intelligenceeducational anxietyintelligent educationstudent mental healthtechnology acceptance theory

Identifiers

PMID42273625
PMCPMC13246331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.