ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Why health apps fail: the role of smartphone proficiency in mHealth resistance.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mobile health apps offer significant potential for health promotion, yet initial adoption remains limited. While prior research has identified app-specific barriers, the perceived usefulness (PU) and psychological resistance toward health apps compared to everyday commercial apps, as well as the foundational role of users' smartphone proficiency, remain understudied. Objective: This study aimed to compare users' perceptions of health apps with those of other app categories and to examine whether smartphone proficiency or health-related status was consistently associated with PU and psychological resistance. Methods: A cross-sectional internet survey was conducted among 717 adults in Japan. We compared the PU of health apps with news, video streaming, social media, and gaming apps. Furthermore, we compared psychological resistance toward a physician-recommended health app with a discount-incentivized shopping app. Ordinal logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of PU and resistance. Results: Health apps were perceived as moderately useful (mean PU = 6.2), similar to social media (adjusted Conclusion: Health apps face practical adoption barriers similar to those of everyday commercial apps. Initial acceptance appears to be more consistently shaped by foundational digital proficiency than by health-related status. To support equitable digital health interventions, public health strategies should prioritize strengthening basic digital competencies in the population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.