Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42273513›Full record

ArticleCochrane evidence synthesis and methods2026

An Open-Source Systematic Reviews Integrated System (OSSYRIS) - Streamlining Processes and Standardising Data Structures.

Xavier Bosch-Capblanch, Christian Auer, A S M Sayem, Guillaume Deschamps, Salvador Camacho, Luís Segura, Salem Al-Aidroos, George Tsey Sabblah, Kaspar Wyss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xavier Bosch-CapblanchSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute Allschwil Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4469-0395
Christian AuerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute Allschwil Switzerland.
A S M SayemFreelance consultant Little Rock Arkansas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7455-6368
Guillaume DeschampsSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute Allschwil Switzerland.
Salvador CamachoSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute Allschwil Switzerland.
Luís SeguraSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute Allschwil Switzerland.
Salem Al-AidroosSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute Allschwil Switzerland.
George Tsey SabblahFood and Drugs Authority (FDA) Accra Ghana.
Kaspar WyssSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute Allschwil Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Carrying out a systematic review (SR) of the literature entails a high workload and encompasses a variety of very different tasks. The emergence of artificial intelligence tools has brought further opportunities to improve the efficiency and reliability of SRs. SR processes can be optimised to the extent that integration and interoperability of software tools across production stages are progressively implemented. A key stage is data extraction, which can be challenging due to the large amounts of data items to consider and the variability of studies reporting styles, which heavily complicates data processing and analyses.We report the development of a software platform that integrates processes across all types of SR tasks, including overviews of SRs, is open source, and addresses the challenges of data extraction through the standardisation of data structures: the "Open-Source SYstematic Reviews Integrated System" (OSSYRIS). Methods: We established a series of criteria to select the software integrated in OSSYRIS: few applications, covering all SRs production processes, inter-operable and open source. After several trials, we selected Zotero as reference manager, KoboToolbox XLSForms for screening and data extraction and R for analyses and reporting. We integrated all components using Application Programming Interfaces (API) in R. For the data extraction form, we identified content items from our own experience and from the Cochrane handbook. OSSYRIS has been piloted and used in several SRs and overviews carried out by the authors. Results: In OSSYRIS, references are manually imported in Zotero and are integrated into XLSForms in KoboToolbox, which are used for online screening by reviewers. R automatically downloads the screening results from KoboToolbox and updates the status of the references in Zotero as 'irrelevant', 'included', 'excluded,' and 'unclear'. R automatically produces the figure with the PRISMA flow of studies and references lists by status, for reporting.Data extraction is manually done using another XLSForm structured in sections: study characteristics, participants, intervention or exposure, outcomes, results and conclusion. Data extraction is standardised by using pre-coded data items, filtering data items according to relevance criteria and modularising data structures. Results of studies are entered using a data structure consistent with the information on the type of outcomes, in a form preceding section. Items that require a decision based on certain criteria, such as which is the type of study or the risk of bias assessments, are not filled in by reviewers; rather reviewers enter the criteria and OSSYRIS internal algorithms issue the specific type of study design or the risk of bias assessments, based on those criteria. XLSForms provide additional functionalities to ensure data integrity. R automatically produces the characteristics of included studies and other analytical outputs for reporting. Standardisation and modularity facilitate adapting the form for different types of SR. Conclusions: OSSYRIS provides an open source, integrated system to carry out SRs. Our work may support the promotion of open source and free tools to conduct SRs bringing together a community of practice to further improve it, within Cochrane and beyond.

Indexed as

data extractionintegrationopen‐sourcesystematic reviews

Identifiers

PMID42273513
PMCPMC13248896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.