Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42273499›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026

Two-Stage Reconstruction for Failed Subtrochanteric Femur Fixation with Peri-Implant Infection and Severe Proximal Femoral Bone Loss: A Case Report.

Ibaad Khan, Alexander A Linton, Thomas J Pumo, Cristian A DeSimone, Eric B Smith, David N Kugelman

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ibaad KhanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alexander A LintonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Thomas J PumoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Cristian A DeSimoneDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Eric B SmithDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
David N KugelmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Subtrochanteric femur fractures are difficult to manage due to high mechanical stresses and complex deforming forces. Treatment often involves placing an intramedullary nail (IM nail) for stabilization and early mobilization. Despite being the preferred fixation method, IM nail constructs remain vulnerable to failure, and repeated fixation attempts can compromise remaining bone stock. When fixation failure occurs in conjunction with early post-operative infection, the combined instability and bone loss may necessitate staged reconstruction. Case Report: A 40-year-old female sustained a right subtrochanteric femur fracture after a motor vehicle collision and underwent IM nail fixation utilizing a recon-style design. Within 1 month, she developed progressive displacement with proximal screw cutout and underwent hardware removal and revision nailing utilizing a cephalomedullary design with a lag screw. Nineteen days later, the revision construct failed with a new femoral neck fracture and further proximal femoral erosion. She subsequently developed thigh pain and erythema, with elevated inflammatory markers and aspiration cultures positive for Staphylococcus capitis, confirming early post-operative peri-implant infection. The decision was made to proceed with a two-stage reconstruction. Stage 1 involved explantation of all hardware, aggressive synovectomy, and placement of a high-dose static antibiotic spacer consisting of a cemented acetabular ball and an antibiotic cement-coated IM nail. After clinical resolution of infection, she underwent second stage revision total hip arthroplasty through a posterior approach. Reconstruction utilized a 54-mm press-fit acetabular cup with a dual mobility liner and a 17 × 300 mm diaphyseal-engaging monoblock tapered fluted titanium stem with cerclage stabilization. Her post-operative course was notable for a single posterior dislocation managed with closed reduction. At the latest follow-up 4 months postoperatively, she demonstrated stable reconstruction without recurrent infection. Conclusion: Fixation failure of subtrochanteric femur fractures combined with early post-operative infection can lead to profound proximal femoral bone loss. This case demonstrates successful management using a two-stage approach with aggressive debridement, static antibiotic spacer placement, and definitive revision THA in the setting of acquired extensive proximal femoral bone loss.

Indexed as

fixation failureperi-implant infectionproximal femoral bone lossrevision total hip arthroplastySubtrochanteric femur fracturetwo-stage reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID42273499
PMCPMC13248597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.