ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026
Comparative Outcomes of Manipulation under General Anesthesia and Ultrasound-Guided Hydrodistension in Adhesive Capsulitis.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) is a disabling condition characterized by pain and restricted range of motion (ROM). Among various treatment options, manipulation under general anesthesia (MUGA) and ultrasound-guided hydrodistension (USG-HD) with corticosteroid injection are commonly used. This study compares their short-term efficacy and safety. Materials and Methods: This prospective, comparative, interventional study included 50 patients aged 30-75 years with primary adhesive capsulitis unresponsive to conservative management. Patients were allocated into two groups using alternate assignment (non-randomized). Group A underwent manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) followed by intra-articular steroid injection, while Group B received USG-HD with steroid injection. Outcomes were assessed using the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), pain score, disability scale, and ROM at baseline, post-procedure, and at 1-month follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed with P < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Both groups showed significant improvement in pain and functional outcomes. However, Group B demonstrated greater reduction in SPADI, pain, and disability scores at 1-month follow-up compared to Group A, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). No major complications were noted, and USG-HD was better tolerated. Discussion: USG-HD provided superior short-term outcomes compared to MUA, likely due to its minimally invasive nature and targeted capsular distension. However, the short follow-up limits assessment of long-term benefits and recurrence. Conclusion: USG-HD is more effective than MUA for short-term improvement in adhesive capsulitis, but longer follow-up is needed before establishing definitive treatment preference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.