ArticleCancer informatics2026
Translating Data Into Clinical Tools: An Integrative Strategy for Precision Biomarker Identification in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Diagnosis and Prognosis.
Article in Cancer informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare, heterogeneous cancers with over 70 subtypes, often diagnosed late due to diagnostic complexity, leading to poor outcomes. We aimed to identify and validate novel transcriptomic biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of STS using an integrative machine learning and bioinformatics framework applied to publicly available cohorts. Methods: RNA-seq and clinical data from 261 STS samples were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). A multi-step analytical pipeline was implemented, including differential expression analysis, functional enrichment, protein-protein interaction network construction, and clinical correlation assessment. Machine learning algorithms were employed for feature selection and model development. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and prognostic value was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: We identified a 26-gene prognostic signature significantly associated with overall survival (15 upregulated and 11 downregulated genes). For diagnosis, Conclusions: This study identifies a novel 26-gene prognostic signature and A1CF-based diagnostic panels for STS using computational methods. These biomarkers represent exploratory candidates for future investigation in STS diagnosis and prognosis; however, experimental and prospective clinical validation are required before their potential use in early detection, risk stratification, or personalized management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.