ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2026
IntelliCage protocols using incentive-disincentive dual motivation work with male as well as female mice and reveal sex differences in motivated behavior.
Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the IntelliCage system, spontaneous behavior and cognitive abilities of mice can be assessed automatically in a social homecage context and without handling by human experimenters. We have recently shown that female mice can be motivated to learn complex spatial tasks with refined IntelliCage protocols that lack water restriction and thereby eliminate the risk of water deprivation in poor learners. These protocols create a dual motivation by combining incentive and disincentive taste stimuli. The mice learn to gain access to saccharin sweetened water while water rendered bitter by quinine remains permanently available. Methods: Here, we used a total of 64 C57BL/6J mice to assess males and females in dual motivation protocols versus single motivation protocols using only saccharin as incentive stimulus. Results: We found that in dual motivation protocols male mice learned at least as well as females provided that the location of target corners was stable over time. When targets shifted frequently and in response to the choices of the animals, male mice lost motivation and learned poorly. Based on lick counts, we did not find evidence of impaired liquid intake despite the addition of a disincentive stimulus. Discussion: Our study demonstrates that by using dual motivation protocols, it is possible to create spatial learning tasks for IntelliCage which do not enforce learning by water restriction and which can be learned by mice of both sexes. Furthermore, our results reveal an interesting sex difference in motivated behavior which is not apparent in protocols that enforce learning by water restriction. We hypothesize that this sex difference may be related to the socio-spatial organization of male mouse groups in the IntelliCage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.