Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42273394›Full record

ReviewEducational psychology review2026

Developing Digital Self-Regulation in Adolescence: A Developmental Self-Determination Model of Digital Self-Regulation.

Ming-Te Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Educational psychology review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ming-Te WangUniversity of Chicago, W-16, WSSC 255, 969 E. 60th St., Chicago, IL 60637 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6170-5448

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital technologies, such as social media, messaging, gaming, and emerging AI platforms, are deeply embedded in adolescents' daily lives and shape their learning, social relationships, recreation, and identity development across contexts. In response to concerns about distraction, mental health, and academic engagement, schools and policymakers have increasingly emphasized restrictive approaches to digital use, including smartphone bans and access limitations. Although such policies may reduce short-term exposure, they often overlook adolescents' developing self-regulatory capacities and basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Drawing on Self-Determination Theory and developmental science, this article introduces the Developmental Self-Determination Model of Digital Self-Regulation (DSMDS), a conceptual framework that reconceptualizes digital regulation as a developmental, capacity-building process rather than a problem of exposure control. Within DSMDS, digital literacy competence is defined as the knowledge and meaning-making foundation of digital self-regulation, whereas regulatory strategies are the behavioral and contextual tactics through which that understanding is enacted across devices, platforms, and activities. The model further theorizes how autonomy-supportive practices across peer, family, school, and policy contexts may scaffold regulation during periods of ongoing executive function development and how these supports may, under favorable conditions, be internalized over time. Importantly, DSMDS treats such progression as contingent rather than inevitable, emphasizing uneven literacy development, problematic engagement, and contextual pressures as important boundary conditions. The framework provides a developmentally grounded roadmap for research, policy, and educational practice aimed at fostering adolescents' more intentional, context-sensitive, and self-directed engagement with digital technologies.

Indexed as

Adolescent digital self-regulationAutonomy-supportive scaffoldingDigital literacy competenceParental mediationSchool technology policySocial media use

Identifiers

PMID42273394
PMCPMC13246567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.