ArticleJournal of clinical and translational hepatology2026
Bile Drainage Improves Survival in Amatoxin-induced Severe Liver Injury: A Prospective Pilot Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Amatoxin-containing mushroom poisoning causes fatal acute liver failure with >50% mortality despite maximal medical therapy. Interrupting the enterohepatic recirculation of amatoxins is a mechanistically rational but unproven therapeutic strategy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biliary drainage (BD) in patients with pre-acute liver failure caused by amatoxin-containing mushroom poisoning. Methods: In this prospective cohort study (ChiCTR2300073442), consecutive adults with amatoxin-induced pre-acute liver failure received standardized care (silibinin, N-acetylcysteine, dehydration). Patients undergoing percutaneous or endoscopic BD were compared to non-BD controls. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Results: Nine patients were enrolled (mean age: 63.3 ± 15.6 years; 44.4% female). All five patients who underwent BD (performed at a median of three days after ingestion) survived (100%), whereas only one of the four non-BD patients survived (25%; Conclusions: Timely BD was associated with 100% survival after amatoxin-induced pre-acute liver failure, contrasting sharply with 75% mortality in non-BD controls. The dramatic biochemical improvement after BD supports enterohepatic recirculation interruption as a mechanistic intervention. BD represents a potentially definitive, life-saving intervention for this lethal poisoning as a preliminary finding; larger, multicenter studies are required to confirm the observed association between BD and survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.