ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Association of Simulation-Based Team Training Implementation with Treatment Process Optimization and Clinical Outcomes in a Chest Pain Center: A Retrospective Pre-Post Analysis of Real-World Data.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Efficient multidisciplinary teams in chest pain centers are critical for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) outcomes. Simulation-based team training (SBTT) may enhance team performance, but real-world clinical impacts remain under-documented. This study evaluated the association between a systematic SBTT program and treatment processes and clinical outcomes in STEMI patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective pre-post analysis at a tertiary center in China. Consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (May 2020-June 2023) were included. Patients were divided into pre-intervention (May 2020-Dec 2021) and post-intervention (Jan 2022-June 2023) groups, separated by the implementation of a multidisciplinary SBTT program. Primary outcomes were door-to-balloon (D2B) and first-medical-contact-to-balloon (FMC-to-B) times. Interrupted time series (ITS) analysis assessed D2B time changes. Results: We included 260 patients (125 pre-intervention, 135 post-intervention). Post-SBTT, median D2B time decreased from 92 to 68 minutes (p < 0.001), and FMC-to-B time from 125 to 95 minutes (p < 0.001). Patients achieving D2B ≤ 90 min increased from 44.8% to 85.2% (p < 0.001). ITS analysis showed an immediate D2B time drop of 23.5 minutes (p < 0.001). In-hospital MACE rates decreased from 12.8% to 5.2% (p = 0.031). Conclusion: These findings suggest that SBTT could be a valuable quality improvement tool in chest pain centers for optimizing the timeliness of reperfusion therapy and clinical outcomes. However, further prospective, multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings and establish definitive causality before universal adoption can be firmly recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.