ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Effects of Acoustic Environments on Well-Being in Sensory-Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acoustic environments profoundly influence the well-being of sensory-vulnerable populations. This review aimed to systematically examine the effects of acoustic environments on the well-being of sensory-vulnerable populations across three domains: health, cognition, and emotion. Methods: This review was reported based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase were searched for peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2025. The certainty of evidence (CoE) was assessed using GRADE approach. Results: A total of 180 articles were included in the review. Among sensory-vulnerable populations, unfavorable acoustic environments were generally associated with poorer health status, reduced cognitive performance, and more adverse emotional outcomes. The consistency of evidence varied across outcome categories, and the research focus differed among population groups. Specifically, studies on older adults focused on disease risk and general cognitive status; children primarily exhibited cognitive and learning-related impacts; the hearing loss group showed issues predominantly related to speech perception and auditory burden; and patient populations were characterized by effects on clinical recovery, sleep quality, and emotional well-being. The CoE for most outcome categories was rated as low or very low. Conclusion: Acoustic environments are closely associated with the well-being of sensory-vulnerable populations. However, the certainty of the current evidence remains limited. These findings may provide useful implications for acoustic design in schools, hospitals, and nursing homes. Further high-quality research is needed to strengthen the evidence base and improve the well-being of sensory-vulnerable populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.