ArticleCirculation reports2026
Task Shifting in Cardiac Ablations Compared With Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: The Japanese Circulation Society Chugoku-Shikoku Regional Survey Subanalysis.
Article in Circulation reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As part of work-style reform for physicians, task shifting to non-physician healthcare professionals has been promoted in Japan. We previously reported task shifting results for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), but the status in arrhythmia treatment remains unclear. Methods and Results: This subanalysis of a survey conducted by the Japanese Circulation Society Chugoku-Shikoku Branch examined task shifting in facilities performing both cardiac ablations and PCIs. A 30-item questionnaire was sent in March 2024 to 93 facilities managing acute coronary syndrome. Among 81 responding facilities (87.1% response rate), 51 performed cardiac ablations. Approximately 40% had only 1 ablation operator. The engagement rate as second operators was lower for ablations than for PCI (21.6% vs. 29.4%, P<0.001). Task shifting implementation showed no significant difference based on ablation operator numbers (N=1: 30.0% vs. N≥2: 16.1%, P=0.304), whereas facilities with fewer PCI operators had higher task shifting rates (P=0.026). Clinical engineers were the predominant profession in task shifting for both procedures. Conclusions: Task shifting of sterile procedures was limited in ablation facilities compared with PCI, reflecting the procedural characteristics such as single-operator feasibility and mapping-intensive workflows. With substantial workload demands, continued collaboration with highly specialized medical staff is essential, along with appropriate incentives and attention to work-life balance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.