ArticleCirculation reports2026
Significance of Lipoprotein(a) in Coronary Artery Disease: A Comparative Study of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Healthy Individuals.
Article in Circulation reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lipoprotein(a) is a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, its distribution based on coronary artery disease (CAD) in the Japanese population remains unclear. We compared lipoprotein(a) distributions among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), and controls. Methods and Results: We analyzed 3,710 individuals who visited Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital from April 2019 to March 2024. Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were classified into ACS (n=724) and CCS (n=579) groups. Another 2,407 individuals without ASCVD undergoing medical check-ups were the controls. Lipoprotein(a) levels were measured before PCI or during check-up. Distributions and associations with prevalent CAD were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. The mean ages were 70, 72, and 56 years in the ACS, CCS, and control groups, respectively (P<0.001). Median lipoprotein(a) levels were 13, 14, and 10 mg/dL in the ACS, CCS, and control groups, respectively (P<0.001). Proportions of patients with lipoprotein(a) >30 mg/dL were 19.1% and 26% (P<0.05), and proportions of patients with lipoprotein(a) >50 mg/dL were 7.8% and 11.5% in the ACS and CSS groups, respectively (P<0.05). Restricted cubic splines suggested continuous associations between lipoprotein(a) and prevalent ACS and CCS. Statin use did not affect intergroup differences. Conclusions: Lipoprotein(a) levels were higher in patients with CAD than in the controls, supporting its role as an independent risk marker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.